June 20, 2013

Real Rate of Inflation -without the lies

Government inflation liesAny time you want to see what happens when inflation runs wild, just look at Argentina. They lied to their citizens just like our own government is lying to us.

The inflation rate in Argentina hit 20,000% in March of 1990. To put that in perspective, a gallon of gas that cost the equivalent of $4 this afternoon, might be $150 in the morning. From 1975 to 1991, inflation averaged 300% annually in Argentina -(Wikipedia).

Let’s look at more recent Argentine history and I’ll tie it in to what is happening in the U.S. The current “official” rate of inflation in Argentina is 10.58% per year. However, anyone who bought food or drove a car in Argentina could see that inflation was far higher than the government reported. In Argentina, it is illegal for anyone to dispute the official inflation rate -or it was until a recent court decision that ruled the law against reporting other means of pegging inflation illegal. In other words, the government could no longer threaten a fine of $120,000 for anyone who calculated and reported their own rate of inflation. The opposition party calculated that inflation was actually 24.43% which everyone (except the government) agreed was a much more accurate figure. Read more about the Argentina inflation suit here.

The bottom line in the Argentina inflation rate dispute was that the government wanted to avoid criticism of it’s economic policies by burying the true inflation rate. In short, it was all about retaining power at any cost -including flat out lying to the people. Which brings us to current inflation policy in the United States. In Argentina, what I am about to tell you would have gotten me fined $120,000.

The official inflation rate in the United States according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics is 1.38%. Funny thing, the official way of calculating inflation was changed in 1980 and it was changed once again in 1990. It was decided that some items, like energy and food, were “too volatile” to measure -so those factors were no longer used in calculating inflation. Basically, the gas you buy and the food you shop for is not part of the inflation equation.

Now, if you use the same methodology that was used in 1980 you reach a surprising conclusion: inflation is actually close to 10%. There is more to it than that, if you want to read more, but the change basically moved us away from defining inflation as “Being a measure of the cost of living needed to maintain a constant standard of living” to one of a hocus-pocus “Inflation is whatever we say it is.”

The common sense test: do you think inflation in the United States is 1.38% as reported by our government, or do you think it is more like 10%?

 

The important question: if you think inflation is more like 10%, why would our government lie to us? This isn’t Argentina, is it? Well, it is to the extent those in power want to stay in power and will fudge any statistic or any fact that does not show them in a good light. I bet a few examples from recent news reports have already occurred to you. Or just think of the Social Security “Trust Fund” that hasn’t existed in decades. Our government still uses the Trust Fund metaphor as though your SS withholding is still put in a “lock-box” and not added to the general fund where it is immediately spent each year.

I’ve given this a good bit of thought, and here is my take on why our government MUST claim that inflation is 1.38% when everyone knows that figure cannot possibly be true. If the government admitted that inflation was 10%, then wouldn’t they have to raise Social Security payments and all those government pensions that have mandatory cost of living adjustments by 10%? By the way, did you know that all government pension payments combined exceed Social Security payments? Try and imagine the amount of money going out if all pensions and SS went up 10% each year.

More importantly, if we admitted inflation was at 10%, and if we stopped buying back our own debt and if the Fed stopped keeping interest at near zero rates, wouldn’t the United States have to pay 6 or 7% interest on it’s enormous debt? And if the United States started paying interest rates that were more in line with reality, wouldn’t the United States then be bankrupt? The answer is a certain and indisputable “YES” because all you have to do is multiply $17 trillion of debt times 6% to see how fast the U.S. would have to default. Payment on interest for our national debt at current interest rates is one of our largest expenses. If we paid 6% interest on our debt, it would nearly equal all personal income tax receipts each year! Try to imagine every penny of taxes you pay going to service the national debt without a cent being left over for defense, education, welfare and Social Security payments.

We have been told for years that the interest rates have been kept artificially low by the Fed to stimulate the economy. I submit that inflation rates and interest rates have been manipulated because the United States cannot print enough money to pay for mandatory cost of living adjustments nor for the interest rates that would result if the Fed let interest rates go to normal levels. This is all like a pressure cooker that is allowed to boil year after year without a release valve. There cannot possibly be a happy ending.

The Dow’s Worst 10 Days

Losing in the market

What do the biggest drops in the Dow have in common?

We started looking at historical trends and the picture starts to get a bit scary. You first of all have to decide whether you want to look at the big drops in terms of dollar losses or in terms of percentage losses. There can be a big difference because losses on a percentage basis will bring in dates from the Depression since the Dow had a lower value back then. However, losses on a dollar basis have more relevance for more current movements in the market.

When you look at the historical worst 10 days in the Dow, you start to see two distinct trends, and that’s the scary part:

The first trend is that big drops are happening with more frequency. The drops are closer together and deeper. In fact, seven out of ten of the biggest dollar drops in the history of the Dow happened in the last 5 years. Take a look at our chart which shows the biggest drops that happened in the last 5 years:

seven

The next thing you notice is that the biggest drops happen in the last 4 months of the year. In other words, in September or later. In fact, nine out of ten of the big drops happened late in the year. Now look at the chart with the biggest drops that happened towards the end of the year highlighted:

nine

Now we have a picture of the 10 Worst Days in the Dow showing that nine out of ten of those worst days happened in the last 5 years and in the last four months of the year.

Some stock gurus, like Harry Dent, are predicting a big drop for the “middle of this summer”. Will he be right? We don’t know -we just know what big drops have looked like for the past dozen years. How much confidence do you have in the market -especially for this summer and forward? I bet not much given the history of the Dow.

Where does Bill Gates invest his money?

Photo credit: biography.com

According to Forbes, Bill Gates is America’s richest man. He went up last year by $6 billion to put him at $66 billion.

How does Bill Gates invest his money?

Amazingly, Microsoft stock only makes up about 20% of his portfolio. All of his investments are held within his investing entity, Cascade Investment, LLC.

His investments seem to be quite diversified. For example, this year he put some more money into Republic Services which is a large trash management services company that includes landfills and recycling facilities. The new purchases leaves Gate’s company with a $2.2 billion position in Republic.

Another large purchase was AutoNation which owns and operates about 256 automobile franchises in the U.S. (mostly in the Southeast). The company has a 52 week range of about $30-43 per share and is currently at a high.

Another favorite of Gates is Ecolab. The company is currently trading about $4 off its 52 week high. Ecolab makes cleaning supplies and represents about $1.6 billion of Gate’s portfolio.

It is hard to follow the logic. Microsoft seems like more of a deal than these three picks that are trading around 14 times earnings. Microsoft is trading at nine times future earnings. Like the way Buffett invests, the theme seems to be diversify, diversify, diversify.

Create your own pension

412(i) retirement plansVery few people are aware of the attractive provisions of IRS-approved 412(i) plans. Never heard of a 412(i)? That is because only experts in the field of income and asset planning know how to use these plans.

Over the years most employers have gotten away from defined benefit plans for their employees to 401(k) and similar plans. With the defined benefit plan, the employee was guaranteed an amount of income for retirement. With a 401(k), there are no guarantees -you get whatever the 401(k) investments will produce at retirement. In other words, you now take all the risk that there will be enough there for a retirement.

Now, a 412(i) plan is more like a defined benefit plan since it guarantees an amount of retirement income -and the income is guaranteed lifetime. As a matter of fact, these plans come under the control of ERISA as a defined benefit plan, so they have the additional benefit of being protected from creditors under federal law.

Who can benefit from these plans? The ideal candidate is someone who self-employed or owns their own small business and compensates himself/herself fairly highly. Ideally, the person should be between the ages of 40 and 75 or perhaps 15 or so years from a planned retirement, regardless of age.  Further, the person should have few employees since there are employee participation rules.

Given the right circumstances, someone around age 50 who pays (or should pay) themselves around $200,000 per year could perhaps put $70,000 (or even more) into a 412(i) each year until retirement. The amount of retirement income available for a lifetime would be known at the time the plan is put together and would be a guaranteed amount.

Pros. This is an ideal method to get money fast into a retirement plan. It is also ideal as an asset protection strategy since large amounts can be removed from creditor actions. There are no limitations on the amount that can be contributed each year and they cannot be overfunded or underfunded which could result in IRS penalties with some other types of plans.

Cons. Most employees have to participate in the plan, although they can certainly be arranged in such a way that the person contributing gets the lion’s share. The relative ages of the employees is also important. This is not an issue for someone without employees or where the employees are persons that you would want to share in the benefit.

Your Biggest Financial Regret

Couple needing long-term careWhen we interview new clients, we ask them what investments they have that they are happiest with and we ask them “What is your biggest financial regret?”

Those two questions help us better understand the person and how they view investing.

One gentleman had a touching story when asked about his biggest financial regret. About 10 years ago his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. She went through all the advised treatments, but she got worse. Eventually she needed around the clock care, which was very expensive and they ended up having to sell their house. In the end, the cancer got her. In hindsight, the gentleman wishes they had purchased long-term care insurance. It would have paid the expenses and he would have saved his house.

His story is not uncommon. Medical expenses like long-term care are not covered in most cases and for most people. Long-term care insurance is a very good thing to have. However, for people who don’t qualify or who don’t want to pay endless premiums, there are some good alternatives that are new. Many life policies now have riders available that make the death benefit available for the long-term care expenses. In some cases, it is even possible to convert existing polices to the new type of policies. Just ask us about the new ways to plan for the cost of long-term care.

 

J.P. Morgan’s “The Sleeping Point”

The Sleeping Point
Reprinted with permission from Crash2 – Surviving the Next Great Depression by Stephen E. Covell

A worried investor asked J. P. Morgan this question in the early days of the Depression: “What should I do about my stocks. I can’t sleep nights.”

Morgan replied: I’d sell down to the sleeping point.”

Losing in the marketIf you agree with even a small part of this book, your sleeping point should be a good bit different than it was before you turned the first page.

Should you liquidate everything and build a bunker in which to store your Krugerrands? Absolutely not. I do not mean for a moment that investors should enter panic mode and sell off every type of investment. What I do suggest is that you start by taking a close look at where your money is invested to see whether a bit of common sense should be applied. Stock brokers have been selling the idea for years that you can just diversify your portfolio and hold on for the long run. With the changes coming this is just not going to work anymore. The “diversify and hold on” strategy is somewhat like buying several houses on the same street in an attempt to spread out risk from flood damage.

For brokers who still try to convince you that holding a diverse portfolio for the long run is a good strategy, ask this simple question: “Would that have been a good strategy in 1928?” It is a good bit of fun to listen to the responses. Some will answer that the market still comes out ahead in the long run. If you read the chapter in this book dealing with Crash 1, you will know the perfect response. You will have learned that it took 25 years for the market to come back to the level it had at the beginning of 1929. Would anyone want to wait 25 years just to break even?

Secular Bear Market

Secular Bull Markets over 100 years

Secular Bear Markets

In the more than 100 years that the Dow has been tracked, there have been a handful of what are known as Secular Bear Markets.

 

I am convinced we are in one now.

 

 

 

 

A market trend is a putative tendency of a financial market to move in a particular direction over time. These trends are classified as secular for long time frames, primary for medium time frames, and secondary for short time frames. -Wikipedia

I suspected we were in a Secular Bear Market (let’s call it a SBM from now on). Now I’m convinced we’re in one. Here’s why: the market cratered Thursday after a strong drop on Wednesday. On Friday, where were the bargain hunters? They weren’t there. The market floundered around from a little up to a little down and ended up a few points up. Normally in volatile markets, bargain hunters who are convinced the drop is short-term start buying up stocks at clearance table prices.

By the way, the best way to remember whether a bear market or a bull market is the one you should be rooting for, keep in mind that it is the bear that eats you.

SBMs tend to last a very long period of time. If you look at the chart, the period after the Depression lasted 25 years and the period ending in 1984 lasted 18 years. We then had an unprecedented period of market growth where it was almost impossible to not make money. Remember day traders? Anybody with a computer could make money picking stocks for short-term movement -the movement was always up. These people all lost their shirts when the inevitable market correction took place. Is what we are seeing now nothing more than a “correction”?

The SBM after the 1929 Crash was partially the result of the policies of Roosevelt in demonizing business, raising taxes and regulating every facet of life. Sound familiar?

So, we not only have the specter of a Secular Bear Market because of market movement and because it is time for one, we will have an aggravated SBM because the current group of politicians do not have a lick of common sense.

You haven’t done so, this might be a good time to review the Prosperity Wheel, which talks about the risks of traditional investing.

Sexual Harassment Case Study

We had a gentleman come in who never dreamed in a million years that he would find himself in the pickle he described to us.

He was in the insurance business and was successful enough to get a free cruise from one of the companies he represented. Because he was in the business, he was fully insured on his life and for every kind of liability, including a huge umbrella policy.

While on the cruise, he got into a conversation with a young women at dinner. He made a comment that the woman apparently found offensive.  Nobody considered the comment to be especially off base, not even the client’s wife who was sitting right next to him when the comment was made. No further thought was given to the event.

However, the woman filed a complaint with the company alleging sexual harassment. Our client was flabbergasted, as was our client’s wife. “Where is this coming from?” they wondered.

Once we heard the story, we first had to give our client the bad news that all of his insurance would be no help. Liability insurance does not normally cover “torts” -which are deliberate acts that harm others, as opposed to accidents. So, if you hit someone in a fight, or if you are sued for slander, those sorts of things are not covered by insurance.

Our client doubts that she will follow up with a law suit, but this was a reality check for him. He is quite wealthy and this made him realize that he is an easy target. Instead of waiting to see if she will sue, or instead of waiting for some other incident, it was decided to re-position some of his assets into creditor-proof investments. In his case, since both he and his wife are in the insurance business, it was easy to convince him to choose some tax-deferred annuities since his wife could take the commission on the sales. In the state where the client lives, all annuities are exempt from creditors, even (with the right circumstances) transfers done knowing there is a potential creditor -like the young (and overly sensitive) woman.

Disclaimer: Covell Financial, LLC, is a registered as an Investment Adviser company with the State of Louisiana through the Office of Financial Institutions. We are licensed through them to give financial advice within the State of Louisiana only.